Full Freeview on the Divis (Northern Ireland) transmitter
 | Google Streetview |  | Google map |  | Bing map |  | Google Earth |  | 54.607,-6.009 or 54°36'24"N 6°0'34"W |  | BT17 0NG |
The symbol shows the location of the Divis (Northern Ireland) transmitter which serves 440,000 homes. The bright green areas shown where the signal from this transmitter is strong, dark green areas are poorer signals. Those parts shown in yellow may have interference on the same frequency from other masts.
Are there any planned engineering works or unexpected transmitter faults on the Divis (Northern Ireland) mast?
Divis transmitter - Divis transmitter: Possible effect on TV reception week commencing 11/11/2024 Pixelation or flickering on some or all channels 
_______
Digital television services are broadcast on a multiplexes (or Mux) where many stations occupy a single broadcast frequency, as shown below.
64QAM 8K 3/4 27.1Mb/s DVB-T MPEG2
DTG-12 QSPK 8K 3/4 8.0Mb/s DVB-T MPEG2
H/V: aerial position (horizontal or vertical)
Which Freeview channels does the Divis transmitter broadcast?
If you have any kind of Freeview fault, follow this Freeview reset procedure first.Digital television services are broadcast on a multiplexes (or Mux) where many stations occupy a single broadcast frequency, as shown below.
64QAM 8K 3/4 27.1Mb/s DVB-T MPEG2
DTG-12 QSPK 8K 3/4 8.0Mb/s DVB-T MPEG2
H/V: aerial position (horizontal or vertical)
Which BBC and ITV regional news can I watch from the Divis transmitter?
BBC Newsline 0.6m homes 2.5%
from Belfast BT2 8HQ, 1,044km northeast (51°)
to BBC Northern Ireland region - 46 masts.
Are there any self-help relays?
| Chapel Fields | Transposer | Central Belfast | 61 homes |
How will the Divis (Northern Ireland) transmission frequencies change over time?
| 1950s-80s | 1984-97 | 1997-98 | 1998-2012 | 2012-13 | 4 Mar 2020 | ||||
| VHF | A K T | A K T | A K T | K T | W T | ||||
| C1 | BBCtvwaves | ||||||||
| C21 | C4waves | C4waves | C4waves | +D3+4 | D3+4 | ||||
| C23 | SDN | SDN | |||||||
| C24 | ITVwaves | ITVwaves | ITVwaves | BBCB | BBCB | ||||
| C26 | ArqA | ArqA | |||||||
| C27 | BBC2waves | BBC2waves | BBC2waves | BBCA | BBCA | ||||
| C29 | ArqB | ||||||||
| C30 | LBT | ||||||||
| C31 | BBC1waves | BBC1waves | BBC1waves | ||||||
| C33 | com7 | ||||||||
| C34 | com8 | ||||||||
| C36 | _local | ||||||||
| C48 | NIMM | NIMM | |||||||
| C55tv_off | com7tv_off | ||||||||
| C56tv_off | COM8tv_off |
tv_off Being removed from Freeview (for 5G use) after November 2020 / June 2022 - more
Table shows multiplexes names see this article;
green background for transmission frequencies
Notes: + and - denote 166kHz offset; aerial group are shown as A B C/D E K W T
waves denotes analogue; digital switchover was 10 Oct 12 and 24 Oct 12.
How do the old analogue and currrent digital signal levels compare?
| Analogue 1-4 | 500kW | |
| BBCA, D3+4, BBCB | (-7dB) 100kW | |
| SDN, ARQA, ARQB | (-10dB) 50kW | |
| com8 | (-16dB) 12.7kW | |
| com7 | (-16.1dB) 12.4kW | |
| LBT | (-20dB) 5kW | |
| Mux 1*, Mux 2*, Mux A*, Mux B* | (-23.4dB) 2.3kW | |
| Mux C* | (-24dB) 2kW | |
| Mux D* | (-24.9dB) 1.6kW | |
| NIMM | (-47dB) 10W |
Which companies have run the Channel 3 services in the Divis transmitter area
|
|
Sunday, 27 January 2013
J
jb385:09 PM
Lynn Steenson: I suspected that this might be the case and as such the comments I made regarding angle of reflections etc is very likely to be the reason for your difficulty, this type of problem not being quite so uncommon as some may think because in many cases it just reduces the level of the signal but with the minimum of variation in its quality, albeit that its lower than it previously was, however in severe cases it results in what you are experiencing and with this being a very difficult type of situation to resolve except in some cases by experimenting with alternative aerial positions, but though with this NOT necessarily meaning higher but a few feet either way in the horizontal plane.
That said, it does have to be admitted and without wishing to appear as a prophet of doom, but in some cases its never really satisfactorily resolved because if a better position is found for the aerial giving the impression that the problem has gone it very seldom ever lasts due to seasonal changes killing it again, as these changes always have an effect on reception levels albeit but with this not really causing any problems to most who reside closer to the transmitting station, but DTT signals coupled to being received at long distances always invites a variety of problems to spring up.
I also experienced exactly the same difficulty as yourself when one of the transmitters that I receive from switched over to high powered operation, as one of its COM channels that I could previously receive dropped out of the box and with no amount of aerial repositioning resolving the problem, and as an engineer I have everything at my proverbial finger tips for carrying out tests and so set about touring the area to find exactly where the signal could be received, it wasn't! however nature itself has assisted as when the weather changed for the worst this improved the situation to a certain extent by providing a terrain that the signal could skip along thereby lifting the level of the signal to just above the reception cut off threshold, something which once again enabled viewing of the channel albeit with the expected number of glitches.
By the way, these green areas seen on the maps are only approximate as indeed are the forecasts made for the expected signal strengths at certain locations in the official trade reception predictor, as no one can accurately predict how an RF signal will behave once its left the mast.
I really regret not being able to be more positive about your problem but its the near to zero quality issue that's the killer, because amplification no matter how powerful never makes any difference in these cases.
| link to this comment |
J
jb386:32 PM
Lynn Steenson: Also meant to add to my already somewhat lengthy posting, that to give an idea of the chances of success by experimenting with moving the aerial it would be prudent at this time to make an enquiry at a neighbours or some other property located close by to find out if the occupiers of same can receive the commercial channels from Divis, secondly, and although a long shot, but it would also be beneficial if you could eliminate the possibility (albeit remote) of a fault having developed on your Fringe mini distribution unit, this done by first of all by removing both coax leads from the Fringe 1290 power supply and connecting them both together (in other words by-passing the unit) then on your Fringe mini distribution unit removing the input from the aerial and also the coax cable from the unit that would go to the 1290 and linking both of these together, this action resulting in the aerial going directly into the TV without passing through anything else, then once done carry out a rescan on the TV.
My only reason for suggesting that you try this is not because I suspect that you are receiving an excessive signal level but just in case Divis's PSB's are triggering some form of instability within the mini distribution amp that's affecting anything of a lesser level than the PSB's passing through it, a tall order but not impossible!
What's been said is on the assumption that your Fringe 1290 is located near to the TV.
| link to this comment |
L
Lynn Steenson10:48 PM
jb38: I bypassed the fringe dist unit and I get no signal at all.
Both neighbours nearby have sky so I cant compare freeview Coms with them!
I now think my only option is to get an engineer out to reposition the aerial and hope for the best!
Thanks for all your help and taking the time to respond :)
| link to this comment |
Monday, 28 January 2013
J
jb3812:01 AM
Lynn Steenson: Well, provide that it was by-passed in exactly the method described then yes! the only option you have left is to try repositioning the aerial, its a pity though that no one around you receives Freeview from Divis, because if they like yourself could not receive the COMs either then there would be no point in trying any tests with the aerial being repositioned as its an area problem.
But thanks anyway for the update, and maybe you could possibly give a further one once some aerial repositioning experiments have been carried out as I would be interested in the results.
| link to this comment |
L
Lynn Steenson12:34 AM
jb38: Yes i by-passed it exactly as you described above, rescanned and no channels were found!
Actually I have a friend who lives approx 1 -2miles from here and they receives all the freeview channels!
Im hoping based on the fact that we used to get all channels before DSO,that we can get them again!
Once I have an update I'll post it here.
Thanks again.
| link to this comment |
J
jb3811:50 PM
Lynn Steenson: OK! will watch out for your update, but as far as your friend is concerned, unfortunately they really reside too far away for their findings to have any bearing on your problem, because experimenting with alternative aerial positions in most cases only involves moving it a few feet either side of where its presently installed and with height not always coming into the equation, this being why I suggested checking with a neighbour as it would at least have indicated if there was liable to be any chance of success by moving the aerial, this type of exercise by its very nature being hit and miss and therefore nothing is guaranteed.
The other point being, that if the zero quality that's seen indicated on the COM channels was associated with a very low signal level then a 15db (min) booster in line "might" bring results, but not in cases where the signal level is already high as that's a symptom of a corrupted signal.
I did also suspect the possibility of a problem existing where the coax downlead is joined into your aerial and that your reception being OK before switchover was purely coincidental, however should anything of this nature apply then this will soon be revealed once an aerial engineer gets involved.
Anyway, and as initially said, I will watch out for an update.
| link to this comment |
Friday, 1 February 2013
F
flipdee10:57 PM
Lynn Steenson, this may have been suggested already, have you tried plugging the receiver in question into a known to be working aerial socket?
Sounds too simple a test I know, but just wondering.
cheers,
flipdee
| link to this comment |
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
W
Wayne Cochran1:23 PM
Armagh
Lynn Steenson, are you sure you're getting Freeview from Divis? Your PSB muxes are definitely on UHF chs. 21, 24 & 27?
| link to this comment |
Wayne's: mapW's Freeview map terrainW's terrain plot wavesW's frequency data W's Freeview Detailed Coverage
Thursday, 7 February 2013
W
Wayne Cochran10:57 AM
Armagh
You can't take it for granted that it's Divis, as Brougher Mountain can prove better in some areas of Monaghan.
| link to this comment |
Wayne's: mapW's Freeview map terrainW's terrain plot wavesW's frequency data W's Freeview Detailed Coverage
L
Lynn Steenson6:46 PM
Armagh
flipdee: yes all the sockets are working fine.
Wayne Cochran: Before the DSO our aerial was set up by an engineer to point at divis.
The checks I did initially showed we were getting signal from Divis. But on your suggestion I checked again and now on investigation I think we are getting Brougher Mountain as we are picking up PSB1 on UHF 28 and PSB2 on UHF 22. Could the recenet inclement weather be the reason for this?
Also we can pick up our Irish channels from Cairn Hill UHF 47 or Clermont Carn UHF 52 with equal quality. Can get the Monaghan transmitter on UHF 55 but quality is poorer!
| link to this comment |
Lynn's: mapL's Freeview map terrainL's terrain plot wavesL's frequency data L's Freeview Detailed Coverage
Select more comments
Your comment please