All posts by martinw
Below are all of martinw's postings, with the most recent are at the bottom of the page.
Fair enough MikeP, it's pointless to carry on the debate as clearly you don't want to believe that I've got something that's actually "from the horse's mouth".
In the meantime, you'd better catch up on this: I'd have told you about it a month ago if you'd been a bit less sure of your own ground but it's official now....
http://www.digitaluk.co.u….pdf
| link to this comment |
Whilst MikeP has been telling me on the Selkirk DAB section that I don't know anything about B700 retuning, this has been brewing for a while, and seems now to be official so I can reveal it.
http://www.digitaluk.co.u….pdf
Shoots down the post B700 allocations shown here doesn't it MIkeP. Selikirk is another site using 32/33/34/35/36/48.
But I suspect you still don't want to believe me eh MikeP....?
| link to this comment |
Well sadly of course that WASN'T the source of my information, merely public confirmation of one tiny part of the jigsaw. The full channel list is still - sadly - not published by Ofcom or anyone else.
Please don't patronise me with your remarks about what is usual; it is also usual that sources are not revealed where it would compromise their position.
Anyway, as you are so determined to mealy-mouth your way round the subject I'll leave you and this website in its stubborn ignorance. "Pure speculation and untrustworthy". Listen to yourself.
| link to this comment |
As I've said on the other thread, you're welcome to carry on in your stubborn ignorance, I've tried to help and all you can do is bleat on that my information is unreliable and untrustworthy.
You won't hear from me again.
| link to this comment |
Page 2
Sunday 29 January 2017 9:07AM
MikeP - I really understand your point of view, I know how frustrating it is when someone does what I'm doing, and if I could reveal further I would. However, this information is not on the internet, it comes from a spreadsheet that sadly isn't for publication.
But I did also ask you (or rather the website) toi explain how it had come up with what are no more than these guesses for Mendip and Selkirk, and you haven't been able to tell me that either.
My main thought is that whilst there is any doubt about the allocations published here for the post B700 clearance situation it would be better to remove them rather than possibly mislead people. And I'll look at that feedback form you've linked to, thank you.